I'm not against cross training protocols. For non-specialists, it's a good way to train; it's fun and encourages a high enthusiasm for training. I myself am a cross-trainer and promote my own variations on cross-training--so I'm not against the basic philosophy. I've developed a reputation as a critic of CrossFit, but it's not the theory behind it, only some specific practices, which I will discuss below.

When new, non-athlete clients tell me their fitness goals, what comes up most is 'I want to get back in shape' or 'I want to lose weight'

While worthy goals, they are also somewhat hollow victories and another example of confusing symbols with meaning. Because the objective of their training is still a certain look. In fact, when pressed for specifics, it becomes clear what the client wants is to look and feel better than they do now. On a deeper level, what they want is to embody beauty.

Long ago, I recognized the kettlebell as a phenomenal training tool. Like me, they are simple but incredibly versatile, and I've since used kettlebells to successfully train not only myself but a wide variety of world-class and would-be athletes. It's true that I enjoy kettlebell training, but it's important that people understand what kettlebells can--and cannot--do.

I get emails from people all over the world asking for advice. Most of these letters are very flattering and appeal to my ego. Often, the letter writer seeks free advice, although they would never phrase it as such. Free information, I give in plenitude via my website, videos and social networks.

The barbell squat. Traditionally worshipped as the holiest of holies, while others reject it as second only to Satan himself. Now factor in a current national trend towards so-called “functional training”, wherein the barbell squat (and deadlift) are deemed sine qua non and what I'm saying, friend-o, is this: The barbell squat is a controversial exercise.

Subscribe to Steve's RSS feed